High Growth Firms Tend to be Old Fogies, Not Startups
In the eyes of many, “gazelles” are coveted.
Gazelles is the name adopted in the 1980s by researcher David Birch of Cognetics, to describe fast growing companies. According to Inc magazine:
‘Some years back, David Birch of the research company Cognetics conferred that name on fast-growing companies, thereby distinguishing them from the “mice” on Main Street and the “elephants” on the Fortune 500. The name stuck.‘
Economic development organizations, non-profit entrepreneurship programs, venture capitalists and other groups jumped on the bandwagon. Gazelles were in. If you wanted to see jobs, economic growth and high investment returns, gazelles were what you had to focus on.
On one level, that’s pretty obvious, right? Fast growing businesses are the ones that are going to bring the biggest returns, presumably add the most jobs, become a larger part of the economy, faster — when compared with slower growing companies.
It’s hard to argue with that.
But one thing that’s always bothered me with the focus on gazelles to the exclusion of slower-growing small businesses, is that it ignores the life cycle of so many smaller companies and startups.
You see, it simply takes time for most businesses to grow.
In my experience a lot of startups are not fast growers immediately out of the gate. Many businesses remain small for years until they reach some critical mass, the business matures and becomes efficient, and growth explodes. Read entire article. ![]()


On the OPEN Forum

How do you take advantage of social media sites without them eating up your entire day, like the attack of the killer tomatoes?



Discussion Boards